(Replying to PARENT post)
To add to the confusion the BBC reported WTC 7 had collapsed before it had actually collapsed. A fact an old work colleague's husband used as evidence (to support not paying his TV license) in court. He suggested that the BBC colluded with terrorists.
This is the only coverage I could find that isn't the Daily Mail. [https://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-a...]
And this is the BBCs explanation. [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_co...]
👤germainemalcolm🕑8y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
That and about a 100 other unexplained questions. Like how it's impossible for commercial aircraft to fly at that altitude with that speed. Like how it's impossible for any passenger to make a phone call during flight, yet there were quite a few making phone calls home when they were suppose to be flying. How the pentagon damage pictures make zero sense. How there not being any security footage for one of the most secure buildings in the world.
👤rapsey🕑8y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
pull it clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk
👤0x4f3759df🕑8y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Trivial? The whole building was engulfed in flames.
👤aiyodev🕑8y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)