(Replying to PARENT post)
It makes sense that building single use rockets is expensive, and with only one launch to amortize the construction cost, labor is a huge factor (materials in a rocket are pretty normal: a lot of carbon fiber, aluminum, titanium, etc). But with reusable rockets, you are bringing that cost way down. If you are able to launch and land 5 times on the same rocket, then effectively you've brought the cost of the rocket to 1/5th of what it used to be.
"a handful of the arms can work together to create the rocketβs entire body as a single piece"
Once you get into reusable rockets, I'm not sure that trying to 3d print the whole thing will turn out. Why? Because you need replaceable parts. You need to be able to tear down, inspect, and replace parts as each part of the rocket has a different lifetime. If you make the rocket as one giant piece, and use efficient methods (reduce weight, size, etc), that it would be much less serviceable over its lifetime.
"We want to get to 1,000 moving parts, fewer than a car."
This is why subassemblies of cars are so expensive, even if you only need to replace a small part of one assembly.
(Replying to PARENT post)
That is Awesome! Seeing how the protoss warped in objects from another spot... I guess to them 3D printing is the precursor to that.
[1]http://wiki.teamliquid.net/commons/images/thumb/e/e4/Protoss...
(Replying to PARENT post)
1. Does 3D printing make sense for large projects like rockets, which will be used in extreme conditions? I thought it was more for prototypes.
2. How does this compare to SpaceX, which is attempting to reuse rockets? How important is this fixed cost if you use a rocket 100 times?
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Impressive for such an impoverished nation.
http://www.38north.org/2017/08/melleman082517/
http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/1203086/wound-filamen...
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/23/asia/north-korea-missile-p...
(Replying to PARENT post)
It makes sense. Rocket engines are mostly a big single piece with lots of internal voids. The fuel is used as a coolant, so there are channels inside the engine bell and some other sections. It's mostly plumbing.
That's the kind of part where 3D printing is useful. Making a big object with internal plumbing out of multiple parts is a fabrication headache. NASA's engines have vast amounts of welding work in them. High-pressure joints are always a problem. Making something with few or no joints is just better. It still has to be inspected, but that's what industrial-sized CAT scanners are for.
(Most of the real-world problems in both rockets and nuclear power involve plumbing and welding.)