👤Ice_cream_suit🕑8y🔼89🗨️48

(Replying to PARENT post)

There's only a relatively small number of astronauts, so it seems the concern here is that the medical condition of individual test subjects is at risk of being disclosed by the paper.
👤Reason077🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The article is:

Role of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Spaceflight-induced Ocular Changes and Visual Impairment in Astronauts

https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161981

It can be found, as usual at SciHub Moscow. So the Russians who use Sci Hub Moscow can read it, but American doctors who subscribe to Radiology cannot...

The original article is worth reading, it talks about choroidal folds and visual impairment that lasts for years after space flight.

👤Ice_cream_suit🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

http://libgen.io/scimag/index.php?s=10.1148%2Fradiol.2017161...

Libgen and SciHub Moscow links to the censored paper.

👤Ice_cream_suit🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

From the article, it sounds like NASA felt the author didn't respond promptly enough to their request for him to redact personally identifiable information (though he did redact it eventually), and is punishing him for it (by pulling both his research and the grant they gave him).
👤PhasmaFelis🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Wait, why are you worrying about Scott Kelly's medical data?

That's what he was in space for, right?

👤mar77i🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

For those interested: the paper is available on researchgate.net apparently
👤emilfihlman🕑8y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The page is not responding. I smell Bigfoot.
👤timinman🕑8y🔼0🗨️0