๐Ÿ‘คpetergeoghegan๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ201๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ68

(Replying to PARENT post)

Note the following passage:

"It's clear to me that a certain proportion of application developers are allergic to putting business logic in the database system, despite the fact that batch processing logic is often a great deal faster when implemented that way. Perhaps the fact that clients are now able to cede full control of transaction scope to procedural code running on the database server (code that can be written in a familiar scripting language) will help application developers to get over the understandable aversion. Hope springs eternal."

๐Ÿ‘คDowwie๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Now, if I could only have a pljulia... so that I could run statistical analysis (packaged as a Julia function) from a query. With PostgreSQL the request queue is never ending ;)
๐Ÿ‘คclarkevans๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Curious to see if the emphasis on parallelism will affect Citus Data's business model?
๐Ÿ‘คfaitswulff๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

A bit off topic but I wish postgres came with a good desktop app. pgadmin 4 is just abysmal compared to e.g. MySQL Workbench.
๐Ÿ‘คchinhodado๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I'm fairly newb to PostgreSQL, and am not an expert (just a user) in many SQL systems. But if Postgres' typecasting methodology is unique to it, by jove it's a great point.

What other features should I learn about (comparisons to MySQL/Oracle)? Any reason to focus on Postgres/Greenplum over a Hadoop hive/impala setup?

๐Ÿ‘คtomrod๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Anyone know what the filter evaluation redesign they did in version 10 was?

> The v10 improvement essentially flattened the representation of expression state and changed how expression evaluation was performed.

It sounds like they were using an expression tree and changed it to something like truth tables, which are essentially "flat" expression representations that can support any boolean expression.

๐Ÿ‘คatombender๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

i am enjoying it much more than sql server
๐Ÿ‘คjuststeve๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

How is it in regards to Vacuuming and DB size?
๐Ÿ‘คnoncoml๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I'm surprised covering indices is only now appearing in 11. It's fairly commonplace in other databases.
๐Ÿ‘คwenc๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Would be nice to see some JIT benchmarks with sample queries and the JIT speedup.
๐Ÿ‘คthe_duke๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Love Pirsig's analogies and can't resist to point out that a "classic approach" will always beat an ignorant hype-driven bullshit in the long run.

Informix (now dead?) vs. Oracle is another classic example from the past.

Oracles's domination absolutely does not imply its technical superiority, actually popularity is usually a bad thing (hello, Ayn Rand) - Java and junk food are insanely popular.

๐Ÿ‘คlngnmn1๐Ÿ•‘7y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0