(Replying to PARENT post)
I generally see that rational applied to whaling only when discussing indigenous populations such as the Inuit in Alaska. They are whaling in small boats and canoes using traditional techniques. Japanโs excuse for whaling is โscientific study.โ I donโt think they are claiming to whale for cultural reasons, nor are they whaling for subsistence, which is allowed under international law.
๐คomnius19๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Your argument doesnโt make more sense that saying we should farm crops like centuries before. The cultural part is about eating whale meat, not how to got it.
๐คtitanix2๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
No, because they are free to mix and match from their cultural heritage, and keep some parts while developing others (and adding new stuff to it).
When we're talking about "cultural heritage", we mean respecting their choices regarding their cultural heritage (including abandoning parts of it). Not that they should absolutely stick to older practices on every aspect of life.
๐คcoldtea๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
will probably get down voted for this but cannibalism was part of some cultures.....just saying, things change.
๐คsiffland๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
And anyways, my understanding is that whaling was not a traditional practice. At least not in the amounts it is done today.
It stemmed from food shortages post-WWII.
๐คhabeebtc๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
This would make too much sense
๐คrblion๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
And my culture has a history of bear baiting and torturing scotsmen. We also made a great game of burning various people who disagreeded with our religion. Cultures have to grow up and recognize a greater good.
๐คsandworm101๐7y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)