(Replying to PARENT post)
It's a chain. You first contact the leaker and their upstream, and then if that doesn't work then their upstream, etc.
At some point you reach a company that's large enough that they must cooperate because they want to remain in business of being an actual responsible ISP.
And then there's Verizon, who can safely ignore any ISP etiquette because they have a de-facto monopoly.
๐คq3k๐6y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
It's sort of a network of trust thing, every time this happens everyone has to scramble to add route filters to ignore the leaked route on all their routers, and then they try to contact the leaker in parallel get them to fix it as well (and their upstream routers).
๐คnikisweeting๐6y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
The upstream provider, if cooperative, could filter out their announcement as a quick fix. It's surprising it happened though, most upstreams put filters in place already.
๐คveswdev๐6y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)