(Replying to PARENT post)
To counter the downvotes from people who are certain there was no “Win93”, here are two internal MSFT emails referring to the same, in clear reference to what ended up being Win95.
http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/codenames/PX0...
http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/codenames/PX0...
👤LocalH🕑5y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Nah, I don't think so, Windows 95 was codenamed Chicago before it was released. I can't remember ever having seen the name "Windows 93" mentioned in that time.
👤roelschroeven🕑5y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
I remember people talking about Windows 97 before 1998 rolled around.
👤jdofaz🕑5y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Source?
I thought they had some design ideas in a later cancelled OS called Cairo, then they had a release codenamed Chicago which ported some ideas but dramatically scaled back, and that was Win95.
👤asveikau🕑5y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)