πŸ‘€laumarsπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό106πŸ—¨οΈ223

(Replying to PARENT post)

We can't outsource our critical thinking to private companies. People need to develop the ability to think critically for themselves and not rely on appeals to authority. This can't happen if people become lazy and simply trust whatever media is out there.

This also raises concerns for me around the question of freedom of speech and censorship. I fear we are centralizing too much power into a few private companies that effectively wield more power than the government and the people for whom it represents.

I'd rather have freedom of speech even if it means tons of misinformation out there.

If and when there is some information that is unpopular but critical for people to know, I don't want censorship to be the norm.

πŸ‘€bcheungπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Spreading misinformation is bad. However, maybe casting media into the memory hole risks creating glorified digital martyrs.

I wish the WHO made more transparent arguments about the utility of masks. Their failure and apparent flip-flop gives the crazies low-hanging fruit and ethos.

πŸ‘€rhemaπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Suppressing David Icke only makes this conspiracy stronger. Icke has close to zero credibility in the UK and well known to believe in lizard people and other such wacky theories.

If you stop people knowing he is also talking about this then the only people left to talk about it are the regular normal seeming folks. Channels like this https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsAwM1EqcYXKeIEufJqwWjw/vid... thousands of views per video, seems like any normal bloke you'd chat to down the pub.

So well done by silencing a known eccentric you just made the only voices in this conspiracy the normal everyday folks, if regular people searched this theory and Icke popped up they might have actually questioned it because they don't want to be associated with the lizard guy.

πŸ‘€whywhywhywhyπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

They need to be careful, such approach would have limited the info about covid-19. When I was watching the news, youtube videos in early Jan, it was coming from the "conspiracy theory" folks. Not mainstream media. Those folks were right.
πŸ‘€segmondyπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

To some degree, the media needs to treat its audience like grown ups who are capable of thinking rationally and coming to reasonable conclusions. The more they try to handhold everyone, it will produce two effects: reduce audience ability to make informed decisions, and reduce audience trust in the media.

Someone showed me the Icke lecture, and so we discussed what are easy ways we could falsify his claims. E.g. countries with high incidence of covid19 and no 5g.

Especially when the conspiracy theory is so easily debunked the media should handle such cases more liberally. Think of it as inoculating the population against misinformation.

I do tentatively agree there are some kinds of misinformation that should be suppressed, but any such thing should be very exceptional, and very well explained. Otherwise, the media will end up being the modern Catholic church and go the way of the reformation. The church has spent centuries undoing the mistakes it made handling Luther's and other's criticisms.

πŸ‘€ytersπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Conspiracy theories linking 5G signals to the coronavirus pandemic continue to spread despite there being no evidence the mobile phone signals pose a health risk.

> One falsely suggests 5G suppresses the immune system, the other falsely claims the virus is __somehow using the network's radio waves to communicate and pick victims, accelerating its spread.__

(__ emphasis mine)

W T Actual F people!

Facepalm.

If it were true it might be one of the greatest discoveries of all time ;)

πŸ‘€jv22222πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

David Icke: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Icke

Can't remember him when he was a footballer, but I wonder how many times he headed the ball ;-)

πŸ‘€samizdisπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Don’t like the direction YouTube and other social media companies are headed. This is pretty much censorship of free speech. I understand that he may be spewing garbage, but sheesh. At this rate YouTube will only have content it wants you to see; this is how it starts.
πŸ‘€whoisjohnkidπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Whenever conspiracy theory talk pops up, I notice 2 groups of people: 1) the conspiracy theorists 2.) the people calling the conspiracy theorists crazy lunatics....rarely anything in-between. Is there anyone out there that can scientifically debunk this guy's claims?
πŸ‘€jb775πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Google: β€œit’s better to be illiterate than have the possibility to read something wrong.”

I swear to god I thought the internet would be so different in 2020.

Before (and even after) the ban there was a lot of good information on YouTube, a lot of it was from trained medical professionals and now it’s all going away and people will be left with gossip and guesses.

πŸ‘€swileyπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

How about we remove all the videos claiming people shouldn't be wearing masks?

Or is actually saving lives to much bother and it's more fun attacking people who believe in reptilians?

πŸ‘€aaron695πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

What is the problem with believing 5G causes coronavirus? The people who believe it are misinformed, and so what?

I understand why it's harmful to spread anti-vax memes, but 99% of "misinformation" is harmless. It's often difficult to separate theory and conspiracy from harmful information, a dubious concept.

πŸ‘€SolvitiegπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Now any content that disputes the existence or transmission of Covid-19, as described by the WHO [World Health Organization] and local health authorities is in violation of YouTube policies.

> This includes conspiracy theories which claim that the symptoms are caused by 5G.

Yeah, fair point. But it's a red herring.

> For borderline content that could misinform users in harmful ways, we reduce recommendations. We'll continue to evaluate the impact of these videos on communities around the world.

This one is KEY. Truth is, the majority of views comes from the Recommended, Trending and Next to Play. No one without a direct link will see your video, if it's nerfed by the algorithm. Checkmate.

Corona is a very heated topic with many unknowns. Deciding what can and can not be labeled as misinformation is thus very tricky even for an expert, because there is a very fine line between misinformation and speculation (which is different in the sense that it's done in good faith and thus perfectly fine). Who's going to make these decisions? A private corp with zero transparency?

We sorely need very clear distinction (maybe even legal - e.g. a framework for Terms of Service) between media and medium. With the former being free to set arbitrary rules, push agendas, ban otherwise harmless content, fuck with content promotion in whatever ways they want, etc. And the latter providing just the infrastructure and technical means to publish content with minimal governance. Status of being either of these must be granted upfront and then prohibited to change.

Otherwise every "social media" platform will eventually mutate into a weaponized propaganda machine, promoting the interests of its stakeholders and greater powers-that-be and suppressing any dissenting opinion. This temptation is evidently impossible to resist.

πŸ‘€atomashpolskiyπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

All social media are strangely censoring anything that even remotely questions the official coronavirus story. I had shared this article on twitter some days ago and it's not even some weird conspiracy theory but twitter flagged it https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-t...
πŸ‘€bishalbπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

This will only further fuel the conspiracy theories because of course the high tech companies suppress information critical of 5G
πŸ‘€okareamanπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I think a solution would be to let the video on the platform but display a huge yellow banner or something like Reddit's quarantine thing where it says "this video contains misinformation about Covid-19" or something more intrusive if you'd like. That way you're not necessarily compromising free speech
πŸ‘€comzillaπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The interview is on London Real's FB page for anyone interested.

https://www.facebook.com/londonreal/videos/206277527340570/?...

πŸ‘€briefcommentπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I don't think this is helpful, it's quite possibly counter-productive. If you're prone to conspiracy thinking, you're going to link any current event to any alternative explanation, no matter how far fetched.

If 5G wasn't in the news, it would be something else. Suppressing the signal only makes it stronger, because now you've "proven" that "the elite can't allow the secret information out".

David Icke is preaching to the choir, he isn't converting anyone. Nobody who is otherwise capable of sound reasoning is going to watch him and go: "I might disagree with this person on whether Zionist Reptile Shapeshifters are controlling the world, but his analysis of the effects of 5G on human health and COVID-19 seem credible!"

Conspiracy thinking is extremely common even among clinically sane people. The "cure" is not suppression, not derision, but letting people figure it out how their mind sometimes works against them. The biggest obstacle is the human ego.

πŸ‘€gridlockdπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Good. This conspiracy theory idiocy about 5G is actively harmful to public infrastructure and it has to stop.

My only complaint is that Icke wasn't demonetized over this. He should be banned from the platform entirely. He's actively harmful to society.

πŸ‘€mullingitoverπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

latest updated figures of coronavirus on https://coronaworld.info
πŸ‘€newsdigπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The answer is education.. we need free, comprehensive education for every person on the planet
πŸ‘€basicplus2πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

oh man... David Ike.

If you ever wanted a trip through la la land go visit his website's forums....

Its a not so coherent and less nasty version of 4Chan where everyone is off the hinge. some more than others.

πŸ‘€senectus1πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

This makes me wonder if there will be β€œcovid19 deniers” in the future just like there have been holocaust deniers ever since the war, claiming that it never happened and is a conspiracy.

It’s really depressing these theories, anti vaccine, and anti science ideas are gaining so much momentum in recent years. And then the world governments pull something like they just did, saying masks don’t work when in fact they help... how can you ever convince anti science people to trust, well, science and governments when this happens??

I suspect this will become a bigger and bigger problem, with more and more people dying of illnesses we have vaccines for. Very sad.

πŸ‘€ornornorπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

If some speech is suppressed everywhere, how can one know that it's false?
πŸ‘€dreamlayersπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Just because there is no evidence (yet) doesn't mean it is misinformation
πŸ‘€poarneemn123πŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

When did David Icke try to pass a gun range in Kentucky off as Syria?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/business/media/turkey-syr...

πŸ‘€jstewartmobileπŸ•‘5yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0