(Replying to PARENT post)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/style/the-man-who-knew-to...
(Replying to PARENT post)
If the information won't affect my behavior/actions, I choose not to invest time into it.
This allows for me peruse headlines to be aware of what's happening (and to consider looking further into something), but keeps me uninvested enough to avoid becoming emotionally consumed by things I won't be taking some action toward/against.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
So much satisfaction from living your life, right where you are. Trust that it all won't come crashing down without your input, and go back to your garden (or whatever you cherish).
Definitely leave facebook memes behind, forever.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
A big one thing you can't change is "the past". People fret about what could have been different or opportunities they missed, or their childhood being different. But you can't do anything about it. You can learn from it and use that going forward, but you can't wish it was different.
(Replying to PARENT post)
I've gotten a lot of shit for this in the past from people saying "you just don't stay informed?" or "it's your civic duty to know what's happening in the world!". If information is really important for me to know, I'll see it. If it doesn't end up on one of the few media sources I consume, it probably won't affect me. I got this idea from MMM [1], which was inspired by The Four Hour Work Week.
[1] https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2013/10/01/the-low-informati...