(Replying to PARENT post)

Uber and it's competitors are "dumping" their services, trying to kill their opponents before they run out of money. When only one survives, they'll raise prices to try to break even.
๐Ÿ‘คsasasassy๐Ÿ•‘5y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I never understood how this can be the business model. Isn't it illegal? https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...
๐Ÿ‘คmehrdadn๐Ÿ•‘5y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Here's the issue with that argument, though.

Platforms win out because of user familiarity, not because they're necessarily the cheapest option.

Uber had and still has a large lead on Lyft. They get free advertising all of the time through the media. How difficult is it to accept that you're not going to be number one in every market (but you'll likely remain number one in most markets), spend money wisely to shore up your position when necessary, and do everything you can to stay profitable?

๐Ÿ‘คzhdc1๐Ÿ•‘5y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

And when they do raise prices another competitor with loads of VC money will appear, trying to "disrupt" them.

The barrier to entry in ride sharing business is so low it's almost non-existent, which makes the whole strategy pointless, unless they can lobby in Congress for some regulatory framework that would make starting a new ride-sharing business harder.

๐Ÿ‘คmamon๐Ÿ•‘5y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0