This article highlights 2 things for me:

1) White text on black is really hard to read. I had to edit the style to read it comfortably.

2) I now get why I don't like Twitter. It's impossible to have a conversation or debate on it. This post was a direct result of that impossibility.

Does anybody else think that the kitchen table analogy totally stands? I have things in my house that contain a significant number of other people's personal information in them. I don't lock them in an extra protected safe in my house because I consider my house to be (relatively) secure by both convention and practice. If somebody were to forcibly enter my house and steal that information and publish it on the internet it would be breaking and entering, regardless of any overarching political point that person was trying to make.

It would also be a huge invasion of my personal privacy which to me seems like something only a jerk would do.

I'm not trying to analogize these things to Anonymous or LulzSec, but I am saying I don't think these arguments for their motives pass any kind of logical test.

What I find particularly striking in this is that attrition.org has been strongly tied to the antisec movement in the past. This leads me to think that the previous "doxing" or disclosure of lulzsec members identities were either staged or a rogue incident. Older antisec groups then appears to be more involved in this recent lulzsec surge

This is not related to today's events but an older article.