(Replying to PARENT post)
I spent a bunch of time doing that in the past, and eventually stopped because I felt like Sisyphus. The same people would crop up on the next thread repeating the same things anyway. Of course if the claims go unchallenged, it leads to the perception that they're accurate...but that doesn't make engaging with them any more enjoyable a way to spend one's free time.
If you want to check the health of the Elm community, visit Elm Slack and ask in the #beginners channel how people feel about it. It takes about the same amount of time as posting a HN comment, but it gives a very different perspective than the one you'd get if your main source of Elm information was Hacker News comments! :)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
What Evan is doing with Elm is awesome, he has a small closed set of features to make a language that is aimed at doing one thing. He has very tight control to make sure there is zero cruft in the language. It's an amazing project. The cost is that it's very hard for outsiders to have any input into the language. So the ecosystem will never take off.
(Replying to PARENT post)
See posts like these for more details and comments:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16510267
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22821447
There are also several great alternatives now. F# with Fable and Elmish for example: https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/the-elmish-book/#/
And Bucklescript TEA with Ocaml or Reason: https://github.com/OvermindDL1/bucklescript-tea
Some others have also gone on to develop new languages taking inspiration from Elm: https://www.mint-lang.com/