(Replying to PARENT post)

I haven't found that to be true at all, but maybe I'm editing different articles. I've gone through on a bunch of math topics that I know a fair bit about and reworded things to be understandable to someone not steeped in jargon and I've always gotten a positive or at least a neutral response.

👤moultano🕑14y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Tweaking what's there isn't so bad. Anything substantial is rapidly punished unless perfect from the start.

👤ColinWright🕑14y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Thanks!

Way too often I find a math article jumps straight into the equations without a good overview that can be understood by someone without a math background. Example applications, for example, would greatly reduce the abstract nature of these pages.

Here's an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controllability

👤mclin🕑14y🔼0🗨️0