(Replying to PARENT post)
Not sure why this guy decided to not mention this rather important detail.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
EDIT 1: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Jan/25/2002927101/-1/-1/0/CSA...
Seems like the NSA recommends a vpn to obscure VSAT use. They don't have much else to say about anonymity.
EDIT 2: Found this thread:
https://old.reddit.com/r/SpaceXLounge/comments/t5y67a/updati...
EDIT 3:
After some thought, I think Starlink will be robust against tracking. They should be harder to locate then VSATs which the author mentions in the Twitter thread. In comparison:
1. They are beaming to a constantly moving swarms of satellites rather then a geostationary satellite: a. So timing attacks can't be used to find a search path. b. The beam is moving to even he a plane pickup on a signal it would quickly lose it as the beam moved. Although there is a workaround I won't mention.
2. They are lower powered so the signal is weaker. I assume they are just as directional.
3. They are smaller and harder to spot.
4. They are much more numerous.
5. They are portable.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
ELINT pods on jets are really good at targeting something that broadcasts on a known frequency. Even if the radiation is directed you still have leakage that is like a spotlight shooting into the sky marking your location. I wouldn't be surprised if Russia could log the location of every operable Starlink terminal if they could get air superiority in Ukraine.
However, without air cover running ELINT pods or at least a lot of ground based signals intelligence platforms they are going to have trouble pinning them down. Especially if they are only used for short periods and moved often. You essentially have to have drones orbiting with ELINT pods and laser guided weapons ready to drop.
(Replying to PARENT post)
Or is this just FUD and someone wanting to get their voice in about any possible intersection of (HOT TOPIC) & (MY SPECIALTY)?