(Replying to PARENT post)
The big point here is that this boosting and potentially servicing mission isn't being pitched by NASA. It's a SpaceX proposal connected to their entirely private program to develop EVA capability for Dragon and to eventually test Starship's ability to support crews in space. Thus for NASA it would likely be cheaper than if they were asking for it.
So the reason we likely won't see a robotic servicing of Hubble (from this) is that it doesn't have as much relevance to SpaceX's goals with Polaris Dawn as just docking, orbit raising and maybe crewed servicing does.
(Replying to PARENT post)
The robots could pick sort 70% effectively while the population of humans after years of training was stuck at 50%. I imagine the efficiency of the robots may even have increased a bit since then.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
The game of Go wasnβt close to being won by a computer until DeepMind came along.
https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/9/11185030/google-deepmind-a...
(Replying to PARENT post)