๐Ÿ‘คcf100clunk๐Ÿ•‘3y๐Ÿ”ผ11๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ11

(Replying to PARENT post)

DW's coverage of same: ''After a training exercise involving 18 state-of-the-art Puma infantry fighting vehicles, not a single one was left operational''

https://www.dw.com/en/technical-problems-plague-germanys-pum...

๐Ÿ‘คcf100clunk๐Ÿ•‘3y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Can't help but notice that no timeframe was published. How long was the exercise? A month? A week? A day?

In any-case, whether the problems plaguing the Puma are fixable by retrofitting, or if a new design all together is necessary, is a real question with some effects to note.

After all, replacing electronic parts is completely different from replacing key mechanical systems or even sections of the hull.

It all depends on test's reports.

๐Ÿ‘คroey2009๐Ÿ•‘3y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

FYI, the way Germany works is that it has a very high threshold for "combat ready". Does "technical malfunction" include things like a headset breaking, or a radio link failing to sync up or other things?

It's probable that in an actual conflict, Germany would be able to safely and reasonably field more vehicles than what they usually list as "Combat Ready" because maybe the tail-light doesn't really matter if you have to actually defend your land.

๐Ÿ‘คmrguyorama๐Ÿ•‘3y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Seems like sabotage. Germany can surely engineer a functioning tank.
๐Ÿ‘คmensetmanusman๐Ÿ•‘3y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0