Wow, what a read. Wokeness really does break people's minds. I see what he means about his friend becoming radicalized by all this.

> Which boils down to this: CRT/BLM is supported by left-wing. So if I am critical of CRT/BLM, then I must be right-wing, and the fact that I even want to discuss this topic means that the discussion is ‘political’.

I've noticed this with ... certain other politicized topics. I'm very left-wing, so it's always amusing being accused of being right-wing by woke fanatics because I happened to disagree with them on some issue. Even if I approach it from a left-wing, anti-capitalist point of view. If it doesn't match what they've been told to think on social media, then that's it - an enemy is speaking, full of evil and malice.

It's all getting quite ridiculous.

I'm impressed Jim gave Scali 56+ pages of conversation. I had to stop entertaining my friends well before that when they started insulting me a 'trans-lover' back in 2020.

I hope Scali can see through the confusing mess they've read themselves into one day.

>marking up Antifa as a terrorist organization may actually be a good call. I feel he had them figured out before I did.

On Trump

>And it's also interesting that all 3 (white) people that were shot in Kenosha, had pretty big criminal records

Scali's warped perception of the Waukesha protests needs to justify why people died.

>This is a civil war, BLM/Antifa are trying to create some kind of Marxist/anarchist state, and the democrats are actually encouraging them.

Grind that axe.

>Anyway, the REAL point is that you don't even bother to listen

Jim just had a 3 month long conversation with you.

Somebody needs a nap.