(Replying to PARENT post)
Did you mean "its" such as in <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34359839>? Given your statement of this being critical... :) (Advice I also gave at work today: just don't use contractions and the right spelling will usually be obvious. In an informal setting, it's more tempting, but that's the way to easily check yourself.)
๐คlucb1e๐2y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
My thoughts exactly. natural language semantics is imperfect and human reasoning is weird. Let's not mistake LLM models as a single source of absolute truth, but a funny & bullshitting assistant who happens to read and vaguely remembers much information.
๐คest๐2y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
I can't tell from the tweet why the Bard response is wrong. Is it because some other instrument has taken an image of an exoplanet, or because no instrument has ever done so? ChatGPT seems to believe it is the latter.
๐คjeffbee๐2y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Here is a prior example of an exoplanet picture: https://esahubble.org/images/heic0821a/
[eg] https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/09/01/nasas-webb-takes-its-...