(Replying to PARENT post)

“To my knowledge, we do not currently purchase commercial database information that includes location data derived from internet advertising,” Wray said. “I understand that we previously—as in the past—purchased some such information for a specific national security pilot project. But that’s not been active for some time.” He added that the bureau now relies on a “court-authorized process” to obtain location data from companies.
👤adolph🕑2y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I thought this paragraph was super weasely. He is specifically saying that they don't buy directly from internet advertising sources, but there are private intel firms[1] that act as middle-men. They offer an interface and tooling that is geared for national security purposes.

The wording of this comment specifically excludes a conclusion on private intel firms. Private Intel middle men would still evade application of the Carpenter decision, and it is obviously superior for the government to work with an agency like that do to human rights and what-not.

[1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj454d/private-intelligence-...

👤phiy🕑2y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Could be that he told underlings it's OK to buy the data, but don't tell him in case he has to testify.

Or they're buying data from cell carriers unrelated to ads.

👤dehrmann🕑2y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/investigation...
👤nerpderp82🕑2y🔼0🗨️0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Location data derived from anything else on your phone, absolutely.
👤quantified🕑2y🔼0🗨️0