Dogmatic and wrong but at least you said it with confidence.

This simplistic line of 'porn bad' is just the pretense for labeling anything out of line with your religion's prescribed morality as pornohrafic and therefore worthy of being expunged by violent means. This ideology never stops at videos containing nudity or sex but continues on to being directed at music, literature, women who don't cover their heads, Transgender people, and so on.

It's the exact justification currently used by conservative turbo-karens to ban books from public libraries that contain any trace if LGBTQIA+ content, histories that acknowledge the slave trade and racism, or even basic health information about periods.

Porn has its fair share of issues with human trafficking, exploitation etc.

But to label all porn as not good is not correct either in my opinion.

If, as an example, you find a porn account of a consentual couple who uploads videos on their own terms - why would that be bad?

Where is the line between porn and art, and how would it remain a consistently enforceable standard? Since early times, through the Greeks to now, art celebrates nudity and sometimes depicts static (because earlier civilizations had no video) representations of sex and violence mixing in order to tell a story (uhh … Persephone and Hades, much? or Zeus turning into a thousand animals to lure women then rape them). Where do you draw the line; why draw it “there” as opposed to anywhere else; by what right is it to suppress, in the process, others’ definition of where to draw said line?

Computer freedom is best. My computer is supposed to do what I tell it to do. I couldn't care less about some government's mandatory child passcodes.

I disagree, but even if you are right, if we accept censoring porn, we will need a bureaucratic censorship corps, and will need to distinguish porn from, for example, lover sending nudes to each other, art with nude sculptures, sex scenes in films, and so on.

And there is zero chance that a bureaucracy designed to censor the citizens will not overextend it's powers and refrain from censoring these things.

So you'd eliminate general purpose computing to get rid of it?

Dogmatic, monochromatic view that is obviously wrong.

for all people replying. I' m referring to this https://fightthenewdrug.org/ (+some peer reviewed studies), not to some religion. Porn is literally bad, if somebody want to jerk off, better use imagination