(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
I recognize that most folk on HN are concerned about QC applied to exact solutions (which realistically just means breaking crypto), but I'm more interested in QC for analog problem solving.
A real issue you have with digital computers is that they are fundamentally discrete. This means emulating or simulating analog systems (aka the real world) devolves to re-running the same simulation innumerable times and then basically averaging them. The benefit of a QC is that you _should_, in an idealized world, require many fewer runs to get an accurate final representation of the result.
If you go to YouTube you can find many examples of analog computers - often artillery and similar - and I think QC have the potential to offer some real gains in scientific computing by making it possible to create programmable analog computers which haven't really existed in the past.
(Replying to PARENT post)
The engineering probably has some cool novelty: 39 qubit and 10 million layers is a very large circuit. But simulating a large circuit is very different to achieving a quantum computing breakthrough in CFD.