(Replying to PARENT post)
Chrome is the product of a company whose mandate is extracting as much data as possible from its users to feed their ad business. Firefox can and should be better, as they could be 100% user focused.
A Chrome monopoly in the browser space has the potential to be more damaging to the web than the Microsoft monopoly in days gone by. They want to make the world a better place? Well, they could have made the web a better place, if they could meaningfully take some share away from Chrome.
(Replying to PARENT post)
Finish making gecko reusable so people can use it instead of blink whenever someone wants to make a custom skin, or instead of electron for "desktop" apps. I grant that it's not immediately user-facing, but it would help give them the actual market share so that web devs have a reason to care about gecko.
(Replying to PARENT post)
A complete new fast browser in rust - ah wait they also fired these engineers.
Not being multiples years late on some browsers features: you can't import es modules in a webworker yet.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
I want a way to instal things on my system without a third party graciously allowing me to, that's what I'd consider freedom and why I try to avoid the playstore like the plague. Seeing Mozilla to not be better either is just sad :(
(Replying to PARENT post)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Firefox&que...
(Replying to PARENT post)
It should be a noble goal that acts as a beacon for others to follow. It'll lose money at first, but they'll keep their core privacy and power user base, until people come around.
Oh and stop following google and privacy advocates supposed efforts to make the web "safer". Those are all mostly propaganda and feel good initiatives whilst the tracking still happens. But that's a long side rant from a pet peeve of mine.
(Replying to PARENT post)
In what significant ways could Firefox be improved, such that it would help most users, over Chrome?