(Replying to PARENT post)
If Youtube devs could see that significant amounts of dislikes were coming from users who hadnโt watched the video, or could identify other statistical aberrations, it stands to reason that such abuse would actively interfere with the legitimate functionality it was intended for and/or work against the interests of YouTube, advertisers, as well as authors and viewers.
I personally think that removing the public counter was an elegant solution in this case, as it suppresses the worst excesses of trolling while maintaining the original intent of the dislike feature, which should improve the overall experience for most users, generally speaking.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
YouTube at this point is globalized TV controlled by one country: U.S.
It got so bad that for countries that do not have their own platforms, YouTube become as worse as adversarial subversive NGO that dictates one narrative and suppresses other narratives. i have seen in recent years countless examples of channels wiped from platform for holding opinionated views not aligned with Neo-liberal west.
Removing features so that you watch what they want you to watch.
(Replying to PARENT post)
I guess I also believe that plenty of platforms with user-generated content have boundless stuff to see, and making the platforms themselves responsible for recommendations gives them almost too much responsibility. I understand it's part of the business plan, but recommendations would become less toxic of a phenomenon if they weren't forced onto your regular user experience as you engaged with the platform.. and better if they were more individual and something you'd have to access separately. Like movie reviews in the paper!
(Replying to PARENT post)
Everytime on groups that share a userbase with Reddit, and on YouTube, you get haters. You don't know who, you don't know why, they just downvotes and burry your comment and they're not able to comment back.
It kills online discussions, make an echo chamber for the leading opinion, and kills any content that's a bit different.
For exemple, some awesome song about Assassin's creed was featured on YouTube, a few years ago, next to related content. (Assassin des templiers)
The quality and the realisation were sublime.
But it got tons of thumbs down because it was in French, and haters only want content in English (filtering your exposition to international content was not the point of upvotes and downvotes!)
So downvotes are pointless imo. It's great they get rid of it (and HN should do the same for the quality of the discussion)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Instead of a single dislike button, force the user to select a dislike reason, with choices such as:
- title doesn't match content
- content is in unexpected language
- content is in low visual quality
etc.
(Replying to PARENT post)
If I watch a speech of someone from the German (right-wing) AfD party, which I very rarely do and start reading the comments, I feel like I'm visiting an echo chamber. Zero negative comments which simply can't be the truth.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/getting-started/example-datas...
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Personally I think Youtube is screwed.
(Replying to PARENT post)
needs a bit more work :)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Rotten Tomatoes is clearly meant to be just a parody website. Look at its name. It can't be taken seriously.
(Replying to PARENT post)
At first when I found a video where every visible comment was โOmg! Iโve tried everything for years, and this is the first thing that worked. Youโve changed my lifeโ, I was excited! Now, I realise that almost every physical therapy video contains the exact same comments. Presumably because they are the ones the algorithm pushes to the top.
This means itโs really hard to know which content is actually trustworthy, especially when thereโs also no downvotes. And for a lot of thing this is really important.
Itโs as if Amazon showed only the glowing five star reviews - suddenly you donโt know what the common problems are with the product youโre about to buy.