(Replying to PARENT post)
I mean in the UK there were cp rings which were known about, that is the girls told the authorities about what was happening to them, and it was buried, so maybe get their own house with systems in place, training and funding (which is universally in short supply in UK since [edit: about] a decade now) to act on info they already get before trying to come after innocent people with a drag net in the hope of catching a few paedophiles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploit...
👤developer93🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
The only way to prevent all crime is 24/7 surveillance combined with constant control and no free will, but any reasonable person would find that unreasonable. That aside, a significant number of people sharing CP aren't smart enough to use an encrypted platform anyway.
👤ronsor🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
CP = "brain_off" to defending your human rights :D
Simple as!
Also see terrorism
👤shrimp_emoji🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
I'm on the other side. IMO; CP is used more and more as an excuse to pass more anti-privacy agenda, because it is difficult to argue against "We want to protect children". That perspective moves discussion to a different place where it is difficult to discuss. Why can't we have both? Is only way to prevent CP eliminating privacy?