(Replying to PARENT post)
Most diseases have a psychological component, but patients are seldom referred to a psychiatrist for treating their heart ache when they get an infarction.
I just mentioned these findings (and others about autoimmunity against the satellite cells in dorsal root ganglia) to my mum, a doctor specialized in physical therapy and rehab. She went into retirement this year and many patients with ME/CFS.
Her reaction: "So fibromyalgia is real now. I have a hard time believing it⦠I spent my career fighting it."
(Replying to PARENT post)
My wife had an emergency department refuse to treat her because they disagreed with an unrelated diagnosis that was in her medical record. Until she admitted that she was "making it up" and didn't have it, so they could "correct" the record, they would not treat her. She ended up having to leave and go to another hospital.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Depression is a comorbidity of chronic illness. It's hard not to become depressed when dealing with an unexplained illness.
Psychiatric treatment can reduce the contribution of the comorbid depression, which can create a net improvement for these patients.
Too many patients with chronic illness will refuse any psychiatric treatment because they are resistant to the idea, but they end up suffering more than necessary.
When doctors can't identify or treat the core illness, they can at least address comorbidities and work on increasing quality of life. Psychiatric care is at the top of the list for helping people's quality of life in these situations.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
It's heavily published on and widely accepted as valid by neurologists, but that does not make it true.
The concept with FND is that there is no identifiable structural pathology, but that the neural circuits are dysfunctional, and that this can be fixed with things like cognitive behavioural therapy. This is typically framed to the patient as "the hardware is completely OK, there's just a problem with the software." (As most of this audience would recognise there is very little overlap between how brains work and how computers work.)
However, more advanced imaging techniques, such as 7T MRI are now showing structural abnormalities in these patients, which is a pretty fundamental problem for the above hypothesis. An attempt to rationalise this by FND proponents is made here.[2]
A recent example involves a 10yo child who developed a movement disorder following Covid.[3] Typically these would be diagnosed as functional movement disorder [4][5][6] and psychological therapy advised. However this group showed that in fact it was due to a neuroimmune pathology, with auto-antibodies forming that targeted some portion of the basal ganglia. The patient recovered completely with immunosuppression.
[1] https://www.bmj.com/content/325/7378/1449
[2] https://neurosymptoms.org/en/faq-2/can-people-with-fnd-have-...
[3] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-023-11853-5
[4] https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.100...
(Replying to PARENT post)
It's very easy to frame what doctors say like this, but in my experience at least that's not really what they're doing. A doctor is a classification machine - they take your symptoms as inputs and output a disease or a syndrome, hopefully with mitigation measures associated with it.
When my wife had long covid for 3 years and doctors couldn't find anything wrong with her a neurologist diagnosed her with a "functional neurological disorder" and suggested psychiatry. My wife felt dismissed and was really mad about it, but the reality is that some sets of symptoms are psychosomatic, and psychiatry can help, so if the neurologist saw 100 people with my wife's symptoms and made the same recommendation to them all, some of them would benefit (as opposed to her making no diagnosis and none of them benefiting)