(Replying to PARENT post)

Depends, but in general would say no.. energy is speed times mass, and mass is cubic in the size, while speed is linear.

Angle is complicated, I mean unless it is very shallow all will still go into earth? I wonder if and at which angle it could impact earth's rotation, but for that then direction is also relevant (:

*: Ah, interesting, the neal.fun/asteroid-launcher also gives same energy for different angles except very shallow ones.

๐Ÿ‘คthrowbadubadu๐Ÿ•‘2y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Energy is (1/2)(mass)(speed)^2. That ^2 term is important.
๐Ÿ‘คridgeguy๐Ÿ•‘2y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I believe that all other factors kept the same, angle does matter b/c of the amount and time you spend going through the atmosphere.

e.g. a shallower angle means you pass through more atmosphere which leads to more heating time which in turn means to "icier" asteroids burning off more of the ice.

I can also imagine a scenario where the asteroid passes so close that it passes through the atmosphere but doesn't actually hit the earth.

๐Ÿ‘คalexpotato๐Ÿ•‘2y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I think the hypothesis is Uranus is tilted 90 degrees because of a collision. Crazy to think of a similar thing happening to the earth.
๐Ÿ‘คirrational๐Ÿ•‘2y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> energy is speed times mass, and mass is cubic in the size, while speed is linear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy#Kinetic_energy_...

๐Ÿ‘คJyaif๐Ÿ•‘2y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0