(Replying to PARENT post)
I asked the desk at the hotel I was staying at what was going on. When the market crashed, the company went out of business. He said the workers literally laid their tools down in the middle of a shift, walked out and locked the gates.
It was very, very strange, because the depth of the crash hadn't yet sunk in to my tiny pea-brain. That really drove home just how bad this was about to be.
(funny but unrelated story from that same trip. We were there for a technical conference on research in K-12 administrator training and development, in the same hotel was a furry convention. Explaining to 75+ year olds what a furry was, and why that man had a fox tail was one of the best, and most surreal experiences of my life)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Honestly it feels like someone thought: "Let's make a neighbourhood for rich people." and didn't quite think it through what those people will need or want.
(Replying to PARENT post)
1) there is some fundamental problem structurally (e.g. no plumbing or no electricity) that makes these otherwise palatial homes unusable (by humans), or...
2) the financing was such that they cannot admit that they will sell for half what was expected, so the whole thing ended up in legal bankruptcy limbo
I don't know which it is, but I am reminded of how, in my home town of Austin, Texas, we have something like 10,000 homeless people but plenty of empty commercial real estate (some of it listed for rent but not actually plumbed up or otherwise available). It's a rather egregious misallocation of resources.
(Replying to PARENT post)
Feels kinda like what's happening with the affordability of housing at least here in California. San Francisco starting being one example of this for similar and different reasons.
(Replying to PARENT post)
The Central Govt in China stopped subsidizing local and provincial govts in the 1990s as a way to force local govts to be more efficient along with incentivizing them to incentivize capitalist developments like a private housing market [1].
This financial mechanism is called a Local Government Financing Vehicle (LGFV) and this is what spurred the growth of ghost cities. [0] [1]
While a large number of local govts in China probably fudging GDP numbers, they're targeting different metrics and this is more of an issue with the less economically dynamic interior provinces like Ningxia, Sichuan, etc. The numbers in economically dynamic provinces like Guangdong, Shanghai, Beijing, Chongqing, Zhejiang, etc are generally reliable [2]
[0] - https://bfi.uchicago.edu/insight/research-summary/is-there-a...
[1] - https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp16187.pdf
[2] - https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/TheReliabi...
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
So per capita, it is about the same.
(Replying to PARENT post)
IMO neighborhoods with a single house design copy-pasted are really unappealing, no matter the country.