(Replying to PARENT post)
Sutskever: "You can call it (a coup), and I can understand why you chose this word, but I disagree with this. This was the board doing its duty to the mission of the nonprofit, which is to make sure that OpenAI builds AGI that benefits all of humanity."
Scoop: theinformation.com
👤convexstrictly🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
I feel compelled to agree with this. I have no issues with OpenAI as it was under Sam, but they did build OpenAI as a nonprofit, and then made it a for profit to further that goal. Assuming VC culture took over, when would it be ok to reign that in? In 10 years when likely all the people that had the power to do this were gone and we were left with something like Google's amnesia about "do no evil"?
👤figassis🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Followup tweet by Kara:
Dev day and store were "pushing too fast"!
👤convexstrictly🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
That seemed to be the gist given the way the board announcement ended by reiterating their original core mission and how their main responsibility was to that mission right after saying that their issue with Altman was interference with their mission.
👤kromem🕑2y🔼0🗨️0
(Replying to PARENT post)
She also says that there will be many more top employees leaving.