(Replying to PARENT post)
https://hbr.org/2012/04/the-real-leadership-lessons-of-steve...
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Hard times create strong people
strong people create good times
good times create weak people
weak people create hard times
Obviously that's not some magic rule or anything, but people shape their surroundings, then the surroundings shape their people. When played out across generations (or multiple phases of ownership at a company, as in your comment), cycles often form.(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Of course thatβs not a guarantee either as theyβre liable to take a few billion and run off into the sunset.
(Replying to PARENT post)
Cost-cutting is always unpleasant, and never done just for fun. Typically companies cut costs when they're feeling squeezed, i.e. they have to.
A company with a "mini monopoly" would not feel squeezed - quite the opposite.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
4.1 Company starts to talk about politics instead of products in their marketing campaigns
4.2 Company starts to cut cost on workforce by pushing out experienced people and hiring cheap newbies
4.3 As a result of the previous one, expertise drops rapidly and product quality starts to drop
4.4 As the product quality decreases, bleeding experienced people makes it impossible to stabilize
4.5 There is nobody left to innovate. The cafeteria manager is the best path to become an IT director (real case: 3 consecutive cafeteria managers in the same office were promoted as IT directors in one of these companies), so the best expertise the management has is to pick the right beverages for the automated vending machines in the office
4.6 Principles and values disappear, corruptions grows, while internal controls don't even bother to look into frauds less than $1 million per incident
4.7 stock price drops, even if the company continuously spends money on shares buybacks
(Replying to PARENT post)
1. Company is product-quality focused
2. Beats competition and creates mini-monopoly
3. Sales becomes somewhat inelastic to changes in quality
4. This leads "cost-cutting" and marketing focused execs/decision making to beat out product quality execs/decision making
5. Company's product quality takes predictable linear path to the bottom