(Replying to PARENT post)
The first link, Effective Go doesn't talk about the philosophy behind idiomatic Go, like _Code like a Pythonista_ does. There is however snippets of Go code on that page, and it's fairly reminiscent of C/C++. I don't really see that as a drawback, for I believe C code is fairly readable for what it offers (speed.) Go likeness to C doesn't offend me one bit, considering the power and speed it offers versus C.
๐คwinter_blue๐13y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
What makes you unimpressed? Why do you think that Python clearly wins? Do you think that the additional type safety, namespace safety, and ease of concurrency in Go are worth nothing? Or do you just think that Python has more that outweigh that?
I know that I frequently kick myself in Python when I typo a name somewhere, and everything dies far beyond where I made the mistake because it goes along happily storing something into that typoed variable, and then when I read it later it has the wrong value, and it takes me a while to trace back and find where I made the typo.
๐คlambda๐13y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Idiomatic Python: http://python.net/~goodger/projects/pycon/2007/idiomatic/han... (doesn't cover a number of important things)
When comparing the two, I'm not impressed with Go.