(Replying to PARENT post)

Or for Pete's sake...

What I tell patients is, if you like coffee, go ahead and drink as much as you want and can," says Dr. Peter Martin, director of the Institute for Coffee Studies at Vanderbilt University. He's even developed a metric for monitoring your dosage: If you are having trouble sleeping, cut back on your last cup of the day. From there, he says, "If you drink that much, it's not going to do you any harm, and it might actually help you. A lot.

What else can you expect from an "institute" with a name like this?

And, surely enough, a little more digging brings this:

Nashville's Vanderbilt University is to establish an Institute for Coffee Studies this fall, funded by $6 million from the Brazilian Coffee Association and other coffee-growing organizations.

http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v5/n3/full/nm0399_252b.html

๐Ÿ‘คgeoka9๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

That was a rather selective quote, given that the same article says this just a paragraph down:

Institute director, Peter Martin, stresses that his research group wants to maintain "arms length" from the coffee industry for ethical reasons. "We are setting up a foundation to oversee the funds which will be administered by independent scientific directors to ensure that there isn't even an appearance of conflict of interest," he insists.

In addition, the original article described a wide variety of studies done by many different institutions. I suppose it's possible that they're all just "studies" conducted by people in the pay of the nefarious coffee lobby, but we probably shouldn't start resorting to conspiracy theories without a little evidence.

๐Ÿ‘คgyardley๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

>Or for Pete's sake...

Why do we assume that the Coffee Association is promoting bad science for their interests, rather than finding scientists who are working on things that relate to their business, and supporting those works?

Who else is going to fund coffee studies besides people with an interest (and money) to fund it? This is how the free market works; as long as the science is sound, who cares who is behind it? I'd rather the coffee industry pay for the studies from excess profits than it coming from the public coffers. It's not perfect, but it isn't full on corruption, either.

๐Ÿ‘คtatsuke95๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I am wondering how much of the world's (biased) research is being done by the special interest groups. As someone said (not sure who) "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"
๐Ÿ‘ค31reasons๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Ad hominem much?

Anyway, the article doesn't rest on that quote by a long shot, it goes on in enormously satisfying detail. It's a humanizing lead-in, at best. I think this is a great summary of recent research on the effects of coffee and caffeine, and it links to supporting studies on nearly every substantial point.

๐Ÿ‘คjrajav๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Maybe you aren't familiar with Vandy but I assure you - they are a highly respected university in the US. There is zero chance - none - that Vanderbilt University is creating a shadow puppet institute.

My brother and sis, who both went there, love to point out that it is called "The Harvard of the South"

๐Ÿ‘คScottWhigham๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Did you mean to to type 'oh for Peet's sake?'
๐Ÿ‘คroedog๐Ÿ•‘13y๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0