πŸ‘€teawithcarlπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό137πŸ—¨οΈ121

(Replying to PARENT post)

This is disgusting. A news agency that is known for defending its own governments' dirty stuff, twisting truth, and manipulating public opinions, is now appreciating a freedom fighter and a human rights activist.

It's apparently not because what Snowden did matches their core values, or they want the same thing happen in China. Oh yes, they certainly like Snowden. It's because Snowden exposed some bad things done by US authorities, and they can use this as political tool; furthermore they can finally take this and say to Chinese people, hey, US does this too. You like the freedom in US? That's all bullshit.

If you are interested in what their reactions were when this kind of thing happened in China, back in 2010, this [1] (google translate: [2]) was xinhuanet's opinion on Chinese human rights activist, Nobel Peace Prize recipient, Liu Xiaobo [3]. They described Liu Xiaobo as an evil man used by western countries to attack Chinese government, while the truth is Liu Xiaobo spent years striving for Chinese people's freedom, human rights, and constitution enforcement in China.

Xinhuanet basically writes what the government tells them to write, and say what the government tells them to say.

[1] http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2010-10/15/c_12664760.htm

[2] http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=http:...

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Xiaobo#Nobel_Peace_Prize

EDIT: typos

πŸ‘€songgaoπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

a program which marks the bleakest moment yet in the history of the Internet

Writes someone from the other side of the Great Firewall.

πŸ‘€glurghπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Did anyone catch the dig against Chinese Internet freedom?

"For this reason China, despite the fact that it does not have a good reputation as far as Internet governance is concerned, should move boldly and grant Snowden asylum."

If this is official government propaganda, why are they saying China doesn't have a good reputation?

The article also calls for Google to withdraw from the United States on the same grounds it withdrew from China - hacking of Gmail and state surveillance.

πŸ‘€unreal37πŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Having researched China for 27 years, εŒ—δΊ¬ε€§ε­¦η­‰η­‰ -

I thought the official Xinhua editorial would be interesting to an HN audience.

Actually, this New Yorker article is better.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5885327

Evan Osnos, a top journalist in Beijing.

πŸ‘€teawithcarlπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Mark my words: by 2041 china will be a freer country than the United States. It is already economically freer in the free economic zones such as Shenzhen.
πŸ‘€cftπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Slightly off topic: China must be very happy about this revelation. We (US) have been criticizing their "great firewall" for so long, but now it's revealed that we have our own program with similar motivations, only a different execution. Rather than burying and censoring information, this surveils your usage of certain information and calls you a terror threat when you step outside the lines.
πŸ‘€brokentoneπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I cannot be the only one who found this line to be amusing:

"Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn."

πŸ‘€betterunixπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Misleading title: this appears to be an opinion article about why the Chinese government should grant him asylum.
πŸ‘€shawnzπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Whistleblowers that serve China's needs.

Oh, you're a whistleblower against any Chinese policy? Say goodbye to your freedom and count yourself lucky if you don't end up in a stadium with a bullet in your head.

πŸ‘€pinaceaeπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I don't think I would want to be an ex-NSA agent with "asylum" in Russia or China right now or at any time in the near-future.
πŸ‘€PherdnutπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Xinhua is the official news outlet of China; they're China's Pravda. They aren't doing Snowden any favors in the US by writing this, but, of course, that's not the point.
πŸ‘€tptacekπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I don't intend on being too harsh on this article, but I must say that it seems about as skewed as a Fox "News" broadcast.

It is not too difficult to find less biased coverage - my favorite technique is to take a story I am interested in and then read two or three articles about it from different countries.

πŸ‘€mark_l_watsonπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

If Xinhua is taking a stand, it means the Chinese government decided they quite like the situation as it is. Looks like Snowden's bet paid off: he'll likely not face extradition from Hong Kong after all, and SEALs teams will be kept at bay.

The boy is hella smart.

πŸ‘€toygπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Considering its origin, anyone have a firm-handle on the Miss Liberty political cartoon? Who's the rat?
πŸ‘€e3piπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

So what's wrong with this article?
πŸ‘€dearπŸ•‘12yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0