(Replying to PARENT post)
The only thing EMV would achieve is making this data slightly less valuable, but still worth it for the attacker. Replacing the EMV cards would also be more expensive by an order of magnitude.
tl;dr: if you use your EMV card on a compromised POS, you'll be as fucked as you'd be with a magstripe card. Your bank will be ten times as fucked.
(Replying to PARENT post)
The attackers probably have my name/email address/mailing information, which kind of sucks.
(Replying to PARENT post)
This is absolutely not acceptable, and I deplore how this has become the status quo. I reject these services and want nothing less than a full lawsuit.
(Replying to PARENT post)
It seems unlikely that the attack would continue since the attackers have lost their cover, but the wording is a bit strange.
(Replying to PARENT post)
edit: "Chip and PIN" is taken directly from the sec filing that is linked.
the described deadline of october 2015 for the liability shift comes from banks[1] and not a US law or similar.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(2) Use BillGuard https://www.billguard.com/
(3) Review your transactions every week or so via a personal finance tool (I use https://www.mint.com/)
I don't particularly care if my payment credentials are compromised as it's highly unlikely a fraudulent charge would go unnoticed by me just using the advice above. It's quick, easy to set up, and stuff you really ought to be tracking anyway.