rbanffy

โœจย Seasoned software developer, proficient in Python, Java. Less proficient in Ruby and Lisp. A bit rusty in C and C++. Learning Erlang very slowly. Also a computer collector and restorer, lover of 8-bit computers, mainframes and interesting Unix workstations.

email: username at that google mail thing

http://about.me/rbanffy

https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]

๐Ÿ“… Joined in 2008

๐Ÿ”ผ 188,709 Karma

โœ๏ธ 62,284 posts

๐ŸŒ€
15 latest posts

Load

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘2m๐Ÿ”ผ1๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘4m๐Ÿ”ผ1๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘38m๐Ÿ”ผ1๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1h๐Ÿ”ผ1๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1h๐Ÿ”ผ2๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ2๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ3๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Most of the apps I work with these days keep state on remote servers, and that state doesnโ€™t always map nicely to a folders and files metaphor, or documents.

The Star was quite inconvenient to work with - and worked with removable media via an import/export metaphor. Also, it had very little of the direct manipulation of desktop objects the Lisa introduced. It knew no drag, only point and click. Ironically, we can say that drag-less UI was a drag.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Thatโ€™s really neat.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

It was a Unix. I believe the distinctive feature is not what it did, but what it didnโ€™t - crash often.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

It was a fascinating idea - programs were hidden behind a document template metaphor. It was not as neat as Windows โ€œNewโ€ menu and its templates folder.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘2d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0