rbanffy
email: username at that google mail thing
http://about.me/rbanffy
https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]
๐ Joined in 2008
๐ผ 153,084 Karma
โ๏ธ 52,079 posts
Load more
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
To figure that out, we'd need to look deep into what's happening in the machine, down to counting cache misses, memory bandwidth usage (per channel), QPI link usage (because NUMA), and, maybe, even go down to the usage stats of the CPU execution units.
When they mention a lot of what was stored procedures has been moved to external web services, I get concerned they replaced memory and CPU occupancy with it waiting for network IO.
(Replying to PARENT post)
It might run on ARM. IIRC, Ampere has some large ones with lots of memory bandwidth. Maybe CXL memory can also help mitigating any disk IO.
(Replying to PARENT post)
HPE has single-image machines that can have up to 16 4th gen Xeons, which gives a top limit of 960 cores. IBM has POWER10 boxes that go up to 240 cores (but they are POWER 10 cores that can do, IIRC, up to 8 threads per core (increasing cache misses, but reducing unused execution units).
(Replying to PARENT post)