rbanffy

โœจย Seasoned software developer, proficient in Python, Java. Less proficient in Ruby and Lisp. A bit rusty in C and C++. Learning Erlang very slowly. Also a computer collector and restorer, lover of 8-bit computers, mainframes and interesting Unix workstations.

email: username at that google mail thing

http://about.me/rbanffy

https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]

๐Ÿ“… Joined in 2008

๐Ÿ”ผ 187,703 Karma

โœ๏ธ 61,949 posts

๐ŸŒ€
15 latest posts

Load

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ4๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Countermeasures can take out some attacking missiles, but not all of them.

Exactly. On asymmetrical warfare, one side needs to get lucky all the time while the other only needs to get lucky once.

> Mass-produced drones today are a simple airframe, a lawnmower engine, and the smarts of a cell phone. Ukraine has people making them in basements. Presumably, so does Iran.

Their cheap and simple nature allows them to easily swarm targets and saturate their defenses. You can defend from a dozen incoming drones, but a hundred is significantly more difficult.

Also, consider the massive quadcopter shows in China as an example of how a well placed shipping container can swarm a target and make a devastating attack. Ukraine demonstrated one and disabled a significant part of the Russian bomber fleet.

> Worst outcome is the US attacks Cuba, Cuba allies with Iran, it turns out that Cuba has been stocking up on Iranian drones, and Cuba becomes a forward base for drone and missile attacks on the southern US.

Cuba would be foolish not to do that at the first opportunity, not to attack the US, but to neutralize any offensive from the US. Without a navy, a land invasion, or an effective blockade, is impossible.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Any country that can veto a UN resolution is, effectively, immune to international law.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I really miss Think Geek :-(
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ2๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ1
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1d๐Ÿ”ผ12๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ1

(Replying to PARENT post)

> What on earth were those 30k people doing?!

Could be lawyers.

Would we be sad if they were lawyers?

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Indeed. Oracle runs on z/OS as well.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

People also marry the database when a significant amount of logic is in stored procedures.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Every company I've worked for has avoided Oracle software of any kind.

Lucky you. Sadly, not all companies are new enough to be able to do that. Some embarked on Java when it was Sun, and Oracle when the only alternative would have been SQL Server (or DB2 on AIX, AS/400, or MVS).

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Clojure

Apple should do more of that - they make cool computers, and should use cool languages.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> The only developers I know who write Java full time work in systems that take pictures of things from far away.

We all have different circles. I work for a bank and the bulk of the LOB code here is Java (or something that runs under a JVM). There are no Oracle databases as far as I know, but my visibility is limited.

Also, Oracle Applications for things like HR.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Imagine if NASA had the resources and the freedom to pursue a high-risk high-return strategy the same way SpaceX did. NASA can't afford high-profile failures because it needs political support to function from a Congress that doesn't understand engineering.

Now imagine the public good will if the US could have built a network of LEO satellites providing communications to everyone on Earth regardless of nationality, with equal access and funded by governments so that all their residents could have access to it for free (once they buy an antenna made in the US).

Some will say it'd be communism. I would say it could be part of a Pax Americana that doesn't involve coups, but is based on willing cooperation.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

We have regions where we deliberately minimize light pollution, but those regions aren't immune to Elon's swarm of photobombing satellites.

Not that I don't think it's cool to have a web of spacecraft enveloping the planet and bringing high-speed communications to everyone everywhere - it's pretty impressive to point up and show a train of satellites to a kid - but astronomers have been complaining about them and they are right.

๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

I only suggested a Falcon Heavy because the rocket exists, is flight proven, and has enough capacity to shoot an Orion to any trajectory it is expected to encounter.
๐Ÿ‘คrbanffy๐Ÿ•‘1mo๐Ÿ”ผ0๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ0