rbanffy

✨ Seasoned software developer, proficient in Python, Java. Less proficient in Ruby and Lisp. A bit rusty in C and C++. Learning Erlang very slowly. Also a computer collector and restorer, lover of 8-bit computers, mainframes and interesting Unix workstations.

email: username at that google mail thing

http://about.me/rbanffy

https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]

πŸ“… Joined in 2008

πŸ”Ό 188,724 Karma

✍️ 62,296 posts

πŸŒ€
15 latest posts

Load

(Replying to PARENT post)

I imagine this is mostly about form-based applications, GUI or not, before the Microsoft pulled the rug from under IBM.
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘2hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> Microsoft advanced the state of UI and UX more than anyone else in the '90s.

There is no universe where that is true.

πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘2hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘2hπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

When you type a table on a typewriter you use the tab to advance to the next column (how many you have depends on the typewriter - you often had margins and one or two tabs). In typewriters, tab doesn’t have a specific width and you don’t have tab stops at every 8 columns. At least on the ones I have here.
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘4hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

A TRUE: device?
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘4hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

> I would guess that using the tab key in this way was part of a patent they were pursuing and Microsoft's use would show this to be 'obvious' and thus not patentable.

IBM insisting it not to be tab wouldn’t make sense. Microsoft was working for them and the programs should adhere to the CUA (Common User Access) standard.

πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘4hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘11hπŸ”Ό14πŸ—¨οΈ1

(Replying to PARENT post)

It always saddens me Intel GPUs are such fourth class citizens.
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘12hπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘12hπŸ”Ό2πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€rbanffyπŸ•‘13hπŸ”Ό3πŸ—¨οΈ0