rbanffy
β¨Β Seasoned software developer, proficient in Python, Java. Less proficient in Ruby and Lisp. A bit rusty in C and C++. Learning Erlang very slowly. Also a computer collector and restorer, lover of 8-bit computers, mainframes and interesting Unix workstations.
email: username at that google mail thing
http://about.me/rbanffy
https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]
π Joined in 2008
πΌ 183,256 Karma
βοΈ 60,813 posts
π
15 latest posts
Load more
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ414π¨οΈ123
(Replying to PARENT post)
At some point itβll be cheaper to convert than to leave the property unused. Raising taxes in vacant property is also an option to drive such conversions.
I agree not all property will be easy to convert, and plumbing and AC will need some adaptation, but any conversion reduces both office oversupply and housing shortage.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Converting no longer viable office space into housing would solve a lot of problems. It would, of course, create problems for those who profit from housing shortages, deliberately engineered or naturally occurring, and those entities will do whatever they can to prevent any housing surplus.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ5π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ39π¨οΈ2
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ3π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ5π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ2dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)