rbanffy
email: username at that google mail thing
http://about.me/rbanffy
https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]
π Joined in 2008
πΌ 189,701 Karma
βοΈ 62,508 posts
Load more
(Replying to PARENT post)
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/henryfo...
(Replying to PARENT post)
I've been using Claude Opus and it's pretty competent. I rarely have to make steering corrections. Once I had to deal with confusion, but, overall, the code is neat and the approaches sensible. It all depends on how much context you give it to work from, for instance. If it's building on top of a well organized codebase with a good best-practices document, it performs just fine.
(Replying to PARENT post)
(Replying to PARENT post)
Wow! Thanks. I didn't see a list of available titles, so I just shot those blindly. And I never imagined DG/UX for x86 was a thing. I'm pleasantly surprised.
> I'm not sure if IBM would care all that much if somebody wrote an emulator for IMPI AS/400s
They might complain loudly about software copyright - it's not the same thing as VM/370 and MVS 3.8j. S/32 and 34 will most likely have the same issue.
> I've never seen images anywhere for NonStop, VOS, or NIROS, nor do emulators exist for the original hardware they ran on.
NonStop and VOS under x86 might draw some fire, and they would also require emulation of the specific hardware - they run on x86, but not on PCs. As for NIROS, you are right, but Nixdorf might be more amenable to even supporting building emulators (they have a very nice museum in Germany).
(Replying to PARENT post)