rbanffy
β¨Β Seasoned software developer, proficient in Python, Java. Less proficient in Ruby and Lisp. A bit rusty in C and C++. Learning Erlang very slowly. Also a computer collector and restorer, lover of 8-bit computers, mainframes and interesting Unix workstations.
email: username at that google mail thing
http://about.me/rbanffy
https://linkedin.com/in/ricardobanffy
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rbanffy; my proof: https://keybase.io/rbanffy/sigs/HtF1uAf_RNpwIkNP1-YGWP_-3doWV6S5Cc1KywXeLYo ]
π Joined in 2008
πΌ 188,725 Karma
βοΈ 62,296 posts
π
15 latest posts
Load more
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ6π¨οΈ1
(Replying to PARENT post)
> Microsoft advanced the state of UI and UX more than anyone else in the '90s.
There is no universe where that is true.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
When you type a table on a typewriter you use the tab to advance to the next column (how many you have depends on the typewriter - you often had margins and one or two tabs). In typewriters, tab doesnβt have a specific width and you donβt have tab stops at every 8 columns. At least on the ones I have here.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
A TRUE: device?
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
> I would guess that using the tab key in this way was part of a patent they were pursuing and Microsoft's use would show this to be 'obvious' and thus not patentable.
IBM insisting it not to be tab wouldnβt make sense. Microsoft was working for them and the programs should adhere to the CUA (Common User Access) standard.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ15π¨οΈ1
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
It always saddens me Intel GPUs are such fourth class citizens.
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ0π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ1π¨οΈ0
π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ4π¨οΈ0
Musk vs. Altman week 1: Elon Musk says he was duped, warns AI could kill us all
(technologyreview.com)π€rbanffyπ1dπΌ2π¨οΈ0
(Replying to PARENT post)