somethingnew

✨ https://twitter.com/itspeterc

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/petercollins; my proof: https://keybase.io/petercollins/sigs/yeZIba2qpUOE6XzgjubdowDhvETHlA7rcczXFu-u9c8 ]

πŸ“… Joined in 2012

πŸ”Ό 633 Karma

✍️ 111 posts

πŸŒ€
15 latest posts

Load

πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘1yπŸ”Ό2πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘3yπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘9yπŸ”Ό2πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘9yπŸ”Ό4πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Here's a summary from the Docker perspective https://blog.docker.com/2016/04/docker-security/
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘9yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό2πŸ—¨οΈ1
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό3πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Besides Session IDs and Session Tickets[1] which already exist in the TLS protocol. He could be referring to the Token Binding Protocol Draft[2] which, quoting from it's summary, "allows client/server applications to create long-lived, uniquely identifiable TLS bindings spanning multiple TLS sessions and connections".

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security#Resum...

[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-01

πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό8πŸ—¨οΈ1
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό3πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Not having to worry about calculating the length of the message before transferring it?
πŸ‘€somethingnewπŸ•‘10yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0